I’m reading about SQL and NoSQL stuff and end up with the site called db-engines.com. There is a  ranking page as below:

Rank DBMS Database Model Score
Dec
2016
Nov
2016
Dec
2015
Dec
2016
Nov
2016
Dec
2015
1. 1. 1. Oracle Relational DBMS 1404.40 -8.60 -93.15
2. 2. 2. MySQL Relational DBMS 1374.41 +0.85 +75.87
3. 3. 3. Microsoft SQL Server Relational DBMS 1226.66 +12.86 +103.50
4. 4. 5. PostgreSQL Relational DBMS 330.02 +4.20 +49.92
5. 5. 4. MongoDB Document store 328.68 +3.21 +27.29
6. 6. 6. DB2 Relational DBMS 184.34 +2.89 -11.78
7. 7. 8. Cassandra Wide column store 134.28 +0.31 +3.44
8. 8. 7. Microsoft Access Relational DBMS 124.70 -1.27 -15.51
9. 9. 10. Redis Key-value store 119.89 +4.35 +19.36
10. 10. 9. SQLite Relational DBMS 110.83 -1.17 +9.98

MICROSOFT ACCESS IS STILL ALIVE AND IT IS NUMBER (7) in the list. This is so weird. I don’t understand how this site measures the rank of the site! It says it is using popularity but how I have no clue! But this shocked me!

2 thoughts on “Microsoft Access is still alive!

  1. My client’s access application is still functioning well, it does what client needs for his factory. That application had some major issues in the past, I spent lots of time fixing the bugs and stabilized the application. Since then, the only thing I need to do for this client is to maintain the db e.g. compact, split due to the access db size limitation.

    1. I heard about these experiences alot and I’m amazed. I think u r app was great that survived!

Leave a Reply to zanganeh Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *